Nano One change 2012 to 2014 ?

fpjlfpjl Posts: 8 Baller
Has the nano one changed from 2012 to 2014?
Have opportunity to get a 2012 but didn't know if there waere any changes made from that year to the present year model.

Comments

  • Than_BoganThan_Bogan Posts: 6,983 Mega Baller
    The new ski is the Nano OneXT, which is definitely different from the Nano One. I don't know all the details, but it's certainly more than just a "model year."
    Nathaniel Bogan -- GUT Padawan
  • GOODESkierGOODESkier Posts: 1,107 Crazy Baller
    edited April 2014
    @fpjl @Than_Bogan‌ I think what he was asking, is if he wanted the Nano One if he got a 2012 used would it be the same as ordering a new Nano One from the factory. My guess is yes, but if you were to order a new ski, you should try the XT! Just my 2 cents.

    To get the whole story call GOODE and ask. Ext 155 is Rick.
    2003 Nautique 196 LE Star Gazer & ZBox - GOODE NANO OneXT 66.75" - Powershell 5 (LFF) - Tournament PB: 2 Balls @ 39.5' OFF (34.2 MPH) on 7/18/2015 at BIG DAWG BROHO!
  • GOODESkierGOODESkier Posts: 1,107 Crazy Baller
    @OB how did you measure the EVERY respect? Or was it a feel thing? Just curious.
    2003 Nautique 196 LE Star Gazer & ZBox - GOODE NANO OneXT 66.75" - Powershell 5 (LFF) - Tournament PB: 2 Balls @ 39.5' OFF (34.2 MPH) on 7/18/2015 at BIG DAWG BROHO!
  • ozskiozski Posts: 1,719
    @OB Jump on the D3 Helix ...
    'Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.'' 2021 MC As soon as it lands Water Ski Equipment - KD Platinum

  • SkiJaySkiJay Posts: 2,314 Mega Baller
    @fpjl‌ The XT also approaches LFF and RFF bias differently. The N1 used different layups and the XT has different rocker on each side.
    www.FinWhispering.com ... Your ski should be your dance partner, not a wrestling opponent
  • WishWish Posts: 8,417 ★★★Triple Panda Award Recipient ★★★
    @SkiJay‌ Doesn't that make it a "twist"?
    >>> 11.25..a different kettle of fish. <<<
  • SkiJaySkiJay Posts: 2,314 Mega Baller
    @Wish I've heard that, but Goode calls it "asymmetric rocker."
    www.FinWhispering.com ... Your ski should be your dance partner, not a wrestling opponent
  • Than_BoganThan_Bogan Posts: 6,983 Mega Baller
    Perhaps there's more than just symantics at work ("twist" vs. "asymmetric rocker"), because I recall that the Twist was polarizing -- some loved and some hated -- whereas it seems like the XT is almost universally well-liked? Or maybe it just hasn't been out long enough for the honeymoon to end and me to hear from the folks who don't like it!?
    Nathaniel Bogan -- GUT Padawan
  • WishWish Posts: 8,417 ★★★Triple Panda Award Recipient ★★★
    edited May 2014
    @SkiJay @Than_Bogan‌ It's kinda like the label Global Warming has turned into Climate Change. Same thing but one has gotten the stink eye so say it differanty.
    >>> 11.25..a different kettle of fish. <<<
  • ForrestGumpForrestGump Posts: 6,282
    If the tip and tail are level, you can't have two different curvatures in between without it being twisted somewhere.
    Shane "Crash" Hill

    Wish
  • WishWish Posts: 8,417 ★★★Triple Panda Award Recipient ★★★
    @ShaneH‌ that's what I was thinking. Doesn't make sense.
    >>> 11.25..a different kettle of fish. <<<
  • The_MSThe_MS Posts: 6,492 Member of the BallOfSpray Hall Of Fame
    I am with @OB, I have a very early N1 and hope to get another season or 2 out of it.
    Shut up and ski
  • Than_BoganThan_Bogan Posts: 6,983 Mega Baller
    If I'm understanding @scotchipman correctly, yet another way to think about it is that the Twist features a "net twist" -- i.e. the angle of the surface continues to rotate in one direction. Whereas the XT might be called a "bend" or a "ripple" or ... how 'bout "asymmetric rocker" -- i.e. there is some change of the surface angle in the middle but then it rotates back.
    So I guess I agree with Goode's terminology: Typically when we use the word "twist" I think we mean a continued increase in angle as we go. Apparently the XT doesn't do that (taking scot's word for it).
    Nathaniel Bogan -- GUT Padawan
    scotchipman
  • HortonHorton Posts: 31,490 Administrator
    I can't bear to read the wacky speculation in this thread. Makes me want to jump off a roof.

    (I am actually on my rental house roof right now. I hate ladders and heights.)

    Support BallOfSpray by supporting the companies that support BallOfSpray

    Connelly ★ DBSkis ★ Denali ★ Follow ★ Goode ★ GiveGo ★ HO Syndicate ★ MasterCraft

    Masterline ★ Performance Ski and Surf★ Reflex★ Radar★ Rodics OffCourse ★ Stokes

     

  • MAD11MAD11 Posts: 578 Crazy Baller
    edited May 2014
    We have had at least 5 Nano one skis made in different time frames ( within 14 months) and as long as I measure with tips, not jaws, they all ski almost identical. If we set the fin up with jaws it's not the same, which means the fin settings were coming up dramatically different. (I have written about this before) I left one in South Africa and one at my house in TX and if I wouldn't have had one made in green to be different, I'm not sure I could have told you which was which. The two skis were made almost 12 months apart. Changing liners actually seems more significant and messes with me. I carried those back and forth when possible.
  • MAD11MAD11 Posts: 578 Crazy Baller
    @OB‌ you don't want my job. It has proven to be extremely bad for my skiing scores. We didn't need 5 skis. Two of them friends grabbed and just replaced ours with a new one.
Sign In or Register to comment.