The YouTube presentation of the University of Minnesota boat wake energy study:

The report is also available here:
https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/226190It demonstrates the differences in wake energy from 4 boats run in various conditions. I noted one significant missing test parameter, the ski boat was not tested at a typical ski speed.
Comments
Support BallOfSpray by supporting the companies that support BallOfSpray
Connelly ☆DBSkis ☆Denali ☆Goode ☆GiveGo ☆MasterCraft ☆ Masterline
Performance Ski and Surf ☆ Reflex ☆ Radar ☆ Rodics OffCourse ☆ S Lines ☆ Stokes ☆
I think what was most frustrating was 3.6.2, Malibu Response LX operation conditions for condition 2:
waterskiing, and wakeboarding (Table 3). The boat traveled in a planing condition at 20 mph with
no wake shaper attached (symmetric wake). The passenger sat in the middle of the boat next to
the boat operator to evenly distribute weight. The hydrofoil was placed in the downward position
creating downward force and additional aft trim.
Come on! At least test it under 20MPH with no wedge and 30+MPH with no wedge if you want to actually provide a range of data. Same for the wake boats...
No boat was ever tested faster than 20MPH, and no boat that had a wedge was ever tested without it. The whole test was designed to make the biggest waves possible. The whole thing felt very bias...
In case anyone cares, this particular organization had a lot of skin in the game:
https://safewakes.org/
This report has garnered significant traction, I have seen it pop up and referenced / shared in various groups / postings / emails / websites, etc. In addition to safewakes, other state organizations have posted it (Michigan Lakes and Streams as an example). These organizations have support when suggesting legislation.